Traditional v. Online Communication

Traditional v. Online Communication
Traditional communication is different from online communication because traditional is instant and immediate.  Online communication has the flexibility to be accessed anytime and from anywhere, but there’s a delay that happens because it’s not face-to-face contact.  People can wait from minutes, to hours, to even days to receive a response from an email, text message, post, etc.  That’s one of the major drawbacks of online communication.
An advantage of online communication for students is that it levels the playing field for everyone involved.  Students that tend to be more reserved can avoid the face-to-face interaction and write what they want without that contact and potential interruption of someone that has a more gregarious personality.  Students can also choose what they want to respond to, and to what length they want to respond, without fear of offending the person they’re talking to.  I like that online communication is limitless and conversations can take twists and turns that you wouldn’t have predicted, which makes for a good discussion among students.
Some disadvantages of online communication are that there are no physical cues.  It’s hard to determine whether someone is making a joke and communication can be misconstrued.  For students, it can be isolating, because there is no peer group of students to bounce ideas off of.  Some students like the direction of sitting in a classroom with the teacher offering instructions that can then be clarified in person.  An online environment doesn’t have that option and it can be hard for the student to feel like they will succeed.
In order to mitigate some of these disadvantages, I like the idea of creating a community group on some form of social media, or in the LMS for the school, where people are available to help mentor or ask questions of other students in the class.  I think it might feel less daunting for students that are struggling because they feel like they have an outlet that they can seek help from.
If I were to teach a hybrid class, I like the idea of being able to have in-class discussions with students.  It would offer students a chance to interact and form a sense of community, while students could complete written assignments at home.  Kemp and Grieve (2014) say that “…a follow-up study with a separate group confirmed that although students appreciated the convenience of completing written activities online in their own time, they also strongly preferred to discuss course content with peers in the classroom rather than online.”  I think it enhances student engagement, creates a more informal environment, and cuts down on the isolation of an online environment. 
Videos are also best viewed online.  Whether they be instructional videos or supplemental material for students to view and then be prepared to discuss in class.  If I were teaching a hybrid course I’d use videos to help supplement material and provide instruction to the students and then facilitate the discussion in class.


References
Kemp, N., & Grieve, R., (2014).  Face-to-face or face-to-screen?  Undergraduates’ opinions and
            test performance in classroom vs. online learning.  Frontiers in Psychology 5, 1278.
Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278/full#h

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Introducing touch-based technologies to low-income early childhood students

Instructional Technology - Augmented Reality